A (Not So) Beginner’s Guide to Solo Jazz Piano –

A great deal of jazz piano pedagogy is devoted to the topic of playing with a rhythm section. Playing solo piano presents challenge (and rewards) of its own.

In clinics and in my private teaching, it’s been my experience that many students over-compensate for the lack of a rhythm section by trying to sound like a whole band.

For example, often less experienced pianists will use the left hand as the “bass player”, walking a bass line on the piano. This is not particularly effective; the left hand tends to get in the way of the right hand because the contrast in sonority that exists with an actual bass player is obviously missing with the “left hand bass,” so the sound gets muddied up. Also, if you are devoting a great deal of your energy and attention to keeping the left hand going constantly, you’ll be distracted from the melodic material you’re trying to create in your right hand.

Obviously this is not a hard and fast rule. Lennie Tristano used left-hand bass effectively at times. In my opinion this generally worked for him because his right hand lines are very strongly articulated and accented. Also, Lennie has a very highly developed sense of dynamic balance and right/left interdependence. He’s very aware of which hand is out front and of how the hands “mesh” together. So if you absolutely love this texture, go for it, but be aware of the issues it raises.

Another solution for creating a convincing accompaniment in the left hand is to play a figure that isn’t constant. It can be an intermittent phrase or a pedal point which is answered by the right hand. This gives the rhythmic momentum and harmonic foundation of the bass but allows the player the space to create something on top of it. Even though the figure isn’t constant, its propulsive effect carries through. The result is a full yet clear texture:

Estate

Sometimes when students play solo for me, I’ll ask, “were you playing rubato or in time?” Often they answer, “I don’t know.” It’s very important to be clear in your own mind about what you are trying to say. Otherwise, it will not be clear to the listener. Playing freely, out of time, can be very effective in creating a mood, so if you’re going to stretch out over the time, then really take your time. Try to feel phrases, not beats or bar lines.

In the Days of Our Love: Excerpt

Conversely, if you’re playing in time, consistency is important. Even though you’re playing by yourself you should still count the tune off in your mind and have a clear tempo going before you start the tune. The more solidly you feel the groove internally, the less you feel compelled to walk a bass line or bang out a chord on every downbeat as a time marker.

One of the biggest challenges in doing an entire concert, or a whole CD, of solo piano is to have enough variety. You may want to vary the head-solo-head routine. One way to do this is to play an introduction using thematic material from the tune to create a “free” improvisation in which you are not necessarily concerned with the tune’s chord changes.
Certain tunes lead themselves well to this approach. I like to open the Thelonious Monk tune, “Monk’s Dream”, this way because, as is typical with Monk’s compositions, it has very strong and distinctive motives.

Monk 1 – Variations on a Dream

The harmony in this case is derived from the way the melodic themes are combined as opposed to the soloist improvising over the pre-existing chords.

Variety is very important when playing on only one instrument. For example, you will want vary the register you are playing in, the meter, the mood, and the time feel. To create as much variety as possible while maintaining an esthetic consistency and unity, for my first solo CD [] link to solo page] I chose tunes from different genres of jazz. For examples, from the modern jazz composition pantheon I recorded Marian McPartland’s beautiful In the Days of Our Love and Chick Corea’s classic, Litha. From the Great American Songbook I chose the Arthur Schwartz classic I See Your Face Before Me, and from the bop era I chose Monk’s Dream. For this CD I chose to record one original, my composition Claude’s Clawed, which is a highly chromatic head arrangement with a free blowing section, very different from the rest of the material.

Claude’s Clawed

I also chose pieces that were not traditionally know as piano pieces, such as Wayne Shorter’s Nefertiti, made famous by Miles’ Quartet, and Sam Rivers’ Beatrice. This allowed me the freedom to create a fresh take on these pieces without comparing my interpretation to what has gone before.

The great thing about solo piano, is that you have total control and all kinds of possibilities; giant block chords to single lines: broad and expansive rubato or solid groove; dynamics from whisper soft to triple fortissimo. Take the time to explore. The rewards will be worth it.

Permanent Art

I attended a concert last night at the Cathedral Church of Saint John the Divine at 112th Street and Amsterdam Ave. It’s an incredible structure, started in 1882 and scheduled for completion in 2026! The Pittsburgh Chorale and Washington & Jefferson College Camerata Singers were the featured artists. One of the pieces on the program was Beethoven’s Fantasia in C Major for Piano, Orchestra and Chorus which utilized a small orchestra of musicians from the Manhattan School of Music. (My fellow New England Conservatory alumnus, pianist Antonio Fermin, whom I met several months ago at an informal NEC event, was the featured pianist and he played beautifully.) The piece was written in 1808. It got me thinking about whether any buildings being built now or any music being written now will still be around in 130 to 200 years.

Billy Mintz 4tet near YOU this week

I’m looking forward to three shows this week with a great quartet . It’s a rare opportunity for you to hear both Billy’s original compositions and west coast saxophonist John Gross, one of the best.

Billy’s writing is really engaging. I think you’ll enjoy this music and I hope you’ll come out this week.

I’m also playing (along with John, Billy and Putter) with saxophonist Lena Bloch 1/31 at Culture Shuk at East End Temple in Manhattan. We’ll be playing standards, and a few originals by members of the group. Lena, in a courageous if foolhardy move, has also asked me to sing a number of tunes.

More Details

The Billy Mintz Quartet

Billy Mintz – drums
John Gross – tenor saxophone
Roberta Piket – piano
Cameron Brown – bass (1/29)
Putter Smith – bass (2/2, 2/3)

1/29/13 West Orange, NJ Whole Foods West Orange
2/02/13 Brooklyn, NY Ibeam
2/03/13 New York, NY Smalls Jazz Club (afternoon show)

More Details

Roberta Solo Concert in Baltimore Fri September 14th

In celebration of her first solo piano CD, Roberta presents her interpretation of standards by (among others) Thelonious Monk, Chick Corea, Marian McPartland, Wayne Shorter and Sam Rivers and others.

She will also answer the burning question, “Why am I talking about myself in the third person?”

This is a lovely room with a beautiful Steinway grand piano. It’s conducive to a terrific and relaxed listening experience.

Check out Roberta’s Youtube Channel for some Solo Excerpts: http://tinyurl.com/RobertaYouTube

An Die Musik Live
409 North Charles Street.
Baltimore, MD
410.385.2638.

All Ages
Shows at 8 and 9:30pm
Admission: $15/$10 students

Save this concert to Outlook or Mac Calendar
Save this concert to your Google Calendar

What Is Jazz and Why Does It Matter? The Jazz Wars – Part 2

Almost ten years ago, I applied for a grant from the Doris Duke Foundation to fund a project with the electric jazz band I was then leading on Wurlitzer electric piano. We had just released a CD, “I’m Back I’m Therapy and It’s All Your Fault”, and I envisioned a second recording integrating both acoustic and electric piano, bring in some Latin elements as well.

I didn’t get the grant, so I called the Foundation to see if I could get some feedback on why I had been rejected. This is pretty standard procedure with arts organizations. Sometimes the insight into why the judges didn’t approve your proposal can help you make a stronger application the next time. The administrator I spoke with found the notes on my application. All it said was that the judges didn’t think my project was jazz. Now, if I had been told that they didn’t think the project was good enough, I could have accepted that, even if I disagreed with them. But to be told, after devoting my life to the jazz idiom, that I wasn’t playing jazz felt like a dismissive slap in the face.

So I found myself reviewing the different elements that we think of as part of jazz to figure out which of them might have been lacking from my effort… Extended improvisations? check. Advanced jazz-based harmonic language? check. One or two blues? check. Lots of spontaneous interaction beween the musicians? check. Swing feel? oops.

Most of the music on the CD was a straight-eighth feel, often with poly-rhythms, but not a swung-eighth feel. Could that be it? But what about bossa nova? Latin jazz? All those ECM records? Not jazz?

Moving further down the checklist – acoustic instruments? Oops again. Electric bass and piano. Could that be why my recording wasn’t jazz? Is the instrumentation a part of the language of jazz? That seems like a silly definition. It’s kind of like saying Bach isn’t Bach if it’s played on a piano instead of a harpsichord.

Everntually I had to accept that whoever the judges of the Chamber Music America competition, their concept of what jazz is was prejudiced by the limits of their own experience and knowledge. I realized that was going to be true for pretty much any grant I applied for; and so ended my potential for a life as a career grant applicant.

For many musicians who are looking for a grant or trying to get written about in a “jazz” magazine, the argument about “what jazz is” is more than academic. Too narrow a definition discourages innovation, leaving us with a stagnant pool of star imitators who pale next to the real greats of the past.

I have no time, for example, for those who argue that Miles Davis was not playing jazz towards the end of his career. (Really? We REALLY have nothing better to do than argue about whether one of the major inventors and innovators of jazz had a right to call his music jazz?)

On the other hand, I understand the cultural, political and artistic concerns of those who see the term jazz being diluted by everyone from pop singers to rambling pop instrumentalists.

Some will argue that any music with improvisation is jazz. But several cultures have improvised traditions that have nothing to do with jazz. Until about 100 years ago, classical composers routinely improvised on their pieces.

The flip side of that argument is that if it doesn’t have improvisation, it’s not jazz. But I could name a number of famous jazz recordings with no improvisation that are included in the jazz pantheon by any reasonable person, such as this one by the quintessential jazz pianist, Wynton Kelly.

So this is my attempt answer to the endless question: WHAT IS JAZZ, prejudiced by the limits of my experience and knowledge.

I believe jazz is any music played (intentionally) by jazz musicians. I know that sounds like a roundabout definition so I will expand on it. If you have thoroughly studied and attained some degree of mastery over the elements of this music (jazz improvisation, jazz harmony, jazz rhythm, jazz phrasing, etc.), then whatever you do, with an artistic intention is jazz.

I use the phrase “artistic intention” as an out for the times when a jazz musician is, for example, playing pop music, for some commercial purpose. I’m not saying that’s jazz just because a jazz musician is sitting in that chair.

But, with that exclusion in mind, I believe if you have mastered the jazz idiom to a certain degree then your music will be informed by that mastery. Therefore, you as the artist have the right to call what you do jazz. (And who has the right to label the artist’s music other than the artist?) If, on the other hand, you haven’t mastered that idiom, then you haven’t earned the honor of using the term jazz.

We might disagree over whether certain singers are “jazz singers” based on their mastery (or lack thereof) of jazz phrasing, harmony, melodic style. But I like my definition because I think it’s inclusive enough, without giving every bulls#$tter on the planet permission to use the word “jazz” to describe their meanderings.

SOLO CD RELEASE TODAY!!

Today is the first day that my first solo piano CD is officially available. This is the first time I’ve done a recording of almost all standards! I felt that for my first solo recording I wanted to start with material as fundamental and malleable as the standard repertoire, a common reference point that I am very comfortable with.

After my last few records, this CD wasn’t so much about stepping out of my comfort zone. It was about stepping back into my comfort zone, and finding out if I still have something to say.

The CD and audio samples are available at CDBaby.com. Downloads are available via itunes and other services.

If you like the CD I hope you’ll share a link to it on Facebook or Twitter. If you do share one of the links below,  I’ll send you a free bonus alternate take NOT on the CD! (Be sure to let me know so I can send you the track!) Here’s how to share the link:

Share the CD on Facebook.

Share the CD on Twitter.

Now contact me so I can send you the bonus track.

I’ve been sharing a series of videos on YouTube of both out-takes and “in-takes” from the studio. The videos include my take on a number of standards including Monk’s Dream, Marian McPartland’s In the Days of Our Love, the lovely bossa nova Estate, and the Dietz/Schwartz classic I See Your Face Before Me.

To be notified when they are up, you can either subscribe to my YouTube channel, or “like” my Facebook Page.

After all that clicking and sharing and watching, don’t forget that you can actually purchase the CD at CDBaby.com, itunes and other places including Amazon, Rhapsody, etc.

Thank you for your support!

Roberta